So alliance just killed rastakhan and lots of our soldiers and horde leader are mad about sylvanas raising some proudmoore !@#$? Bad writing strikes again...
So much for Blizzard to say "were not going to take Sylvanas the way Garrosh went". Well lets see here Garrosh blew up a city, Sylvanas burned a tree. Garrosh took slaves and killed children and innocent. Sylvanas did that. Garrosh committed atrocities and Sylvanas also did that hmmmm starting to see a trend. Oh and an added bonus making the own faction question if Warchief went to the right person.
wait, the horde commits genocide, burns a tree full of childrens alive, raise their troops, kill their own people, impale people in front of their childs, but suddenly raising derek is going too far?and apparently derek is the only weapon that the horde has, that hopefully he can kill jaina and that would be enough to win the war?who writes this stuff?
Baine for Warcheif please. The new Horde is not an evil faction and anyone who ever thought it was needs to work on their reading comprehension.
Didn’t somebody from Blizzard say that there would be at least seven different expansion ideas? (And twenty years left for WoW’s popularity) Because we might be getting close to WoW’s end :(
Am I the only one frustrated that everyone is freaking out over Sylvanas raising a single person as undead? Something she's done countless times before? What's so horrible about this specific occasion?On a lighter note, I'll always welcome further hints of the vulpera becoming an allied race.
It's terrible writing all together. As it sounds like right now, she raises Derek, she wants him to kill Proudmoore's which likely won't happen, how exactly does killing Proudmoore's accomplish anything? Jaina won't die to this and shes not the leader of the alliance.How exactly will this win Sylvanas the war? Sylvanas has always been kinda evil but she was more calculating in the past, now she's being written to run around with cartoon villain schemes that clearly won't backfire at all (Ashvane and Derek)And the rest of us have to follow this crazy cartoon villain, the sooner we kill her off, the better.
"We don't want to start another war with the vulpera. We just need to ensure they never want to work with the Horde again."The next stop. Purge Squads."The val'kyr hardly had to even offer before I was back on my feet. What else did you expect?"I think this is the first time in Lore that a character outside of Sylvanas has confirmed the Valk actually ask before bringing people back. I guess people get a prompt and Lorash slammed that button.As for the rest. People on the horde side need to nut up some. They didn't balk when Stone was revived. They didn't balk when M Marshal was revived and he LITERALLY WAS TAKEN FROM RIGHT NEXT TO PROUDMOORE and got summarily discarded so quickly we didn't get a chance to talk to him.Then Baine and all act like Proudmoore was a step to far despite him being the exact same situation.I'm going to be mad if we put Derek down instead of letting ANY of the horde war campaign had had any point or results for the horde.
"War isn't pretty. I know that all too well, and so does Windrunner. You have to decide what you're willing to do to achieve victory... and what you're not.""Don't act so surprised. We both know the Banshee Queen has always been capable of tactics like these. As she's so fond of saying, they are the arrows in her quiver. This changes nothing for me... or for what I need to do."This feels like Lor'Themar
Judging from his outright wailing "what's happening? what have you done to me?' I'm gonna go with a hard no that Derek was asked sweetly if he'd like to be brought back as undead. Apparently Val'kyr only ask people Sylvanas likes if they want to be undead. Even in the cata-era Forsaken starting area the player and other new undead aren't asked to be risen...they're risen by the Val'kyr and then asked if they want to *stay* risen.
So tasty :) !Sylvanas will pay for her crimes at the end, she diserves nothing but eternal death.
"Baine continues to be upset"In other news, water is still wet.
i honestly have to say that if they do end up killign sylvanas and doing garrosh 2.0.....i may actually quit the game at that point.I can udnerstand doing that stuff, but when they flat out state they wont do soemthing., then backtrack on that....i cant soundly support a company that lies :/
I think the unknown speaker is Garona. During the war campaign, she talks about doing what she has to and her comment to Nathanos about killing Anduin din't feel genuine.Yes, that "Treachery of the Alliance" aka killing an enemy leader. So evil. Far more evil than starting a war, burning down a World Tree, killing hundreds of civilians, human experimentation, destroying your own home with biological weapons, raising the dead as slaves, invading a nominally neutral kingdom, and blackmailing your own allies into aiding in your personal grudges. Did I miss anything?
Time for Mists, boys.
Dear god I hope the uncredited isn't Lor'themar, but it probably is.Also, people complaining that people are 'just now' complaining, we've been complaining since BfA datamining about %^&* like burning Tel or slaughtering people or raising the dead etc, just every time we do someone screeches to shut up and omg waifuchief.
Funny that raising Derek shocks many of the horde npcs but burning Teldrassil with many of its civilians did not. Leave that to blizzard for being total racist ^&*!@#$s to night elves.