What is the point of a tier list where you have distinct ranks like S/A/B and so on, when you start using new subranks like A+ the moment you have to make a tough decision between putting specs in S tier or A tier?
Maybe I don't get tier lists, it's totally possible as there are a lot of stuff I don't get, but what's the point of defining a tier list with 7 tiers if you put every partaker on the same tier?
It's been a long time that every healer were that close to each other. Giving me a good feeling about the next raid & M+ season.
Looks accurate but more precise ranking IMO looks something like this:S: Disc and Holy PalaA+: ShamanA: Holy PriestB:Druid and Monk
These tier list are a bit bs to be honest, this is the real tier list:S: Disc, Holy PaladinA: ShamanB: DruidC: Holy PriestD: Monk
So strange to read about Mistweaver here only mentioning Ancient Teachings of the Monastery. I thought for raiding, Tear of Morning was now superior?
People doing Tier Lists when literally in every patch they are wrong. I mean Jaydaa f.e. is healer in a top 100 Mythic guild, big respect to that and he knows enough stuff about WoW. But even he should know by now, that these lists make no sense, specially when you are only allowed to rank everything A. Its every. !@#$ing. Patch. But yeah go on and believe Monks will be as good as Paladins.
Even if both legendaries where equally good for healing, Ancient Teachings basically gives you a decent amount of damage on top of using less mana.
I saw the tank tier list and was thinking " Giving all of them the same grade makes the whole point of a tier list moot" but didn't bother to say anything. I don't like being negative just for the sake of being negative and understood the point being made was that all the tanks were really close in performance to one another. But honestly this healer tier list is BS. If you don't want to give anyone a bad grade don't make a tier list. This is just a refusal to rank the specs and that isn't a helpful tier list. Contents of the article aren't bad. Comments made are true. But there is a clear refusal to evaluate anything critically. Call a weakness a weakness and don't act like it all balances out in the end when there are just clearly superior options... If there are only "small" differences like in the case with tanks you must be hyper critical in order to rank them into tiers. The differences, small or large as they may be, are the thing being evaluated and scrutinized as is the entire point of a tier list.
mistweavers secret S tier