Today we've asked our Ranged DPS Class Writers. 🤔
Is there a reason these still dont include PVP point of view? None of this applies to MY specific use of said class.
arms warrior summary - hey so we know it's extremely powerful in pvp but we're not really gonna do anything about it apart from imply it's broken. Good luck out there! what a joke of a developer...
What about Surv hunters? Was it simply forgotten, or is it really that bad?
I like the SV hunter changes!
ok,surv hunters has been deleted from the game,i get it.
It seems that the PvP burst that WW monks had up to now was entirely based around things that weren't supposed to be happening (i.e. tricks that the ghosts could perform but the player could not), so personally I'm quite glad that they've fixed them, as it brings a certain clarity to the class that was lacking for WW newbies such as myself!
Do something about DH Havoc for ST maybe new Talent or something. For M+ is ok but Raiding is BIG problem
The part about using Signet for Fury confuses me. The guide for Fury says Deathmaker is better, and extensive testing and posts elsewhere say the same thing. So, a typo on the writer's behalf perhaps?
That's not a very good nor in-depth review by the Rogue writer. Rogue legendaries had several buffs and the writer did not discuss them at all.Also as an outlaw rogue I was waiting for write-ups like this to figure out if Concealed Blunderbuss would be more competitive, but it looks like the writer is an Assassination main, which would have been better if the article said that this is looking only at changes to Ass.
Tell those a**hats to not change a heavily enjoyed and polular ranged spec into melee and then not let it get buffed to be decent because no one plays it because you a**hats changed it!Also why has fire mage done like 19% on average more dps than some specs over the last like 11 raids while bringing multiple group utility?
As a long time Sv hunter player tell them screw you too