This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Why be a warrior
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
364444
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
255458
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
104722
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
kemikalkadet
The QQ is strong with this one.
Post by
364444
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
SeaOfHoles
QQ or not, it's true. Blizzard did one of the poorest balancing jobs with the DK class in any game I have ever played. Seriously, WTH were they thinking.
Post by
Kramp
DKs are still a very powerful class and I won't deny I hate CoI but 3.2 made them fairly balanced in my opinion.
Post by
Uricidea
I think the answer you (tyrel18, and SeaOfHoles) need to hear is: Don't. Simply don't play a Warrior. The warrior class and ethos says if it's too damned hard, just roll a Pally. Make it easy on us and yourselves. All of that crying is just gonna rust your armor anyway.
Post by
338789
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Lorkin
seriously why did they put warriors in wow when DK's are here.
Er, Warriors were here first dude.
No really can you post why to continue a warrior?
You should level your warrior to 55 then reroll a DK.
Post by
349260
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
181908
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
twitch77
Frankly 90% of warriors ( and since ur QQing like this I bet ur in the 10%) are flat out awesome cause they had to learn their class and learn to play it well.
very nicely put.
and to op, just don't play a warrior. if thier too much work for you, and not fun for you. . .then just don't play them.
why even ask?
the people i see QQing about their warriors more often then not just don't know how to play their warrior well.
this isn't always the case of course. . .but most the time it is.
Post by
87278
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
SeaOfHoles
I think the answer you (tyrel18, and SeaOfHoles) need to hear is: Don't. Simply don't play a Warrior. The warrior class and ethos says if it's too damned hard, just roll a Pally. Make it easy on us and yourselves. All of that crying is just gonna rust your armor anyway.
Q: Where did I ever complain or say I was unhappy with my Warrior?
A: Oh. Gee. I didn't.
Q: Does the fact that I like my Warrior mean I don't understand what a horrible job Blizzard did in defining and balancing DKs?
A: No. My eyes are wide open. I haven't buried my head in the sand.
Q: Why didn't you play a DK?
A: FOTM. OP class. No challenge. They had to be nerfed eventually.
Post by
428681
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
SeaOfHoles
If you don't like Warrior, don't play Warrior. But I have to agree with
Kramp
, 3.2 did whip some balance into their class.
Understanding another class is OP, and that you are at a disadvantage doesn't mean you don't like your class. Not everyone is a FOTM @#$%^, and you shouldn't assume that posts that are not "YIPPEE, WARRIORS ROXXORS" means you don't like your class.
Post by
Lasthitlarry
Better tanks, more challenging, more fun for some, people like you more and make fun of you less, unique abilities...
I myself am not going to make a DK for these reasons and others. I don't want to play a hunter mage warrior paladin shaman warlock, I've already played those.
Post by
87278
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
356035
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.