This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Alterac Valley: New Horde Turtle Ruins this bg,....
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
105944
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
687175
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
105944
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
687175
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
105944
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
687175
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Azazel
When was the last time somebody actually posted something on-topic?
Post by
250582
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
341987
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
243770
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
243770
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
250582
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
105944
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
stepone
shred
shred
And bam, two shreds it is! Game over. I win.
in time i hope u realize how badly you just lost
Post by
341987
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
cloudp
I just find it interesting that most people that try to face Shad in an argument by mirroring his style fail in a proportionally miserabe way. Bryta, if you really wish to keep this up, keep it on the topic. You NEVER argued on topic. Is his doing the cause of degradation of the thread, and your absurd "game"? I'm sorry, but you "harvest what you plant" (Ok, I have no idea how to actually translate this to english, it's a proverb, it doesn't sound as good as it does in Portuguese, but you got the idea).
I told you before, how you were the ones bringing his arguments. The warning passed without notice, it seems. Hospy seems to be the only one actually trying to argue on the topic. Right or not, his arguments were discussed by him and shad in a mature way, maybe some roughness on Shad's side that wasn't necessary, but that's just his style. Hospy didn't take it personally. The others just couldn't take Shad's roughness and retorted in ad hominems and general, sorry to say, crap.
I certainly don't particularly like his style. As someone before mentioning it, reading the quotes line by line in the way he posts doesn't help people trying to follow the argument, forcing us to go some pages back to get a grip of what's being said. I wouldn't present some facts in such a rough way as his, either. However, should he argue with you that way, and you take his arguments. You point why you said it. You don't point strings of attempted irony and ignore what he said. What kind of consistency can anyone expect from your arguments if they're based on "lol, because shad's rude ignore what he said"?
This had to be said, as people seemingly don't know how to deal with Shad's style in a mature way. Take something important from this thread in those words, at the very least.
Post by
341987
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
cloudp
* effects or affects? Sigh, I hate the partial interchangeability of those words
Effects - Results.
Affects - "Something that affects another thing" - Changes.
This is an oversimplified way, of course. "To Affect" is a verb, while "Effect" is a noun.
Mutual help :)
Post by
76912
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
76912
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.