This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
72 year old grandma has a kid with her grandson
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
364444
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
pezz
Nice to see the Sun making strides towards serious journalism.
Post by
danalise22
I feel as though my memories as a small child sitting on my grandmothers lap just got dirt kicked in their metaphorical faces. While i understand love is blind, this is just nauseating.
Post by
150529
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
364444
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Meh, &*!@ happens.
Post by
484925
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Wow.......isn't incest illigal?
And if not, it should
I know right, its effing disgusting..
except if you read the article there is no insect envolved
Well there probably is... but they aren't physically having the kid together lol.
Post by
MischievousLoki
except if you read the article there is no insect envolved
Of course not, sex with bugs is impossible.
Post by
MyTie
How judgemental everyone here is of something that is socially unacceptible. However, when two men want to get married and have a baby, they were 'born' like that, and consenting adults should love whoever they want to love.
I'm not stamping my seal of approval on either homosexuality or incest, but you guys need to stop holding double standards for two things equally unnatural and disgusting, simply because society thinks it is ok or not.
Post by
560264
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MischievousLoki
I'm not stamping my seal of approval on either homosexuality or incest, but you guys need to stop holding double standards for two things equally unnatural and disgusting.
Let's be friends.
Post by
Adamsm
How judgemental everyone here is of something that is socially unacceptible. However, when two men want to get married and have a baby, they were 'born' like that, and consenting adults should love whoever they want to love.
I'm not stamping my seal of approval on either homosexuality or incest, but you guys need to stop holding double standards for two things equally unnatural and disgusting, simply because society thinks it is ok or not.
Meh, &*!@ happens.
I didn't care lol; some people just have weird tastes, and as the baby isn't technically going to be their mixed genes, go for it.
Post by
364444
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Deepthought
I didn't care lol; some people just have weird tastes,
and as the baby isn't technically going to be their mixed genes
, go for it.
Uhh, where does it say this? Also:Nice to see the Sun making strides towards serious journalism.
Post by
pezz
How judgemental everyone here is of something that is socially unacceptible. However, when two men want to get married and have a baby, they were 'born' like that, and consenting adults should love whoever they want to love.
I'm not stamping my seal of approval on either homosexuality or incest, but you guys need to stop holding double standards for two things equally unnatural and disgusting, simply because society thinks it is ok or not.
Incest is partially (mostly?) taboo, I'll give you that, but it also increases the incidence of genetic defects.
I think a better example might be safe sex between homosexuals verses safe sex versus people related by blood. Neither is physically dangerous to anyone involved, anyone theoretical, or anyone real but not involved, but safe homosexual sex is much more acceptable than safe sex between relatives.
As much as I hate to play devil's advocate in a thread like this, and as much as I'm uncomfortable agreeing with an anti-gay rights post, the social taboo on incest, especially relationships where no children are planned or wanted, is disproportionate to the threat to any member of society.
Post by
MischievousLoki
I think a better example might be safe sex between homosexuals verses safe sex versus people related by blood. Neither is physically dangerous to anyone involved, anyone theoretical, or anyone real but not involved, but safe homosexual sex is much more acceptable than safe sex between relatives.
What about safe homosexual sex between relatives?
This thread is getting to be NC-17 (as if it didn't start there).
Post by
364444
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
pezz
Probably,
fine, other than having a pretty messed up home situation. The risk of defects is increased in an incestuous relationship, but it's not like there's a 99% chance babies will be born with six arms or anything.
Post by
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.